<span>Mumbai was the major Indian city in the 1860s because it could supply British mills with cotton.</span><span />
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:
Hope you are referring to WW1
the league of Nations who was formed. the league formation followed the agreement of treaty of Versailles . in addition, Germany was allowed to keep it's land but was to pay heavy penalties as a result
Han in the Xiongnu were several of the battles from "133 BC to 89 AD". During the reign of the WU emperor where the Han Chinese won over the Xiongnu, before these battles the Xiongnu were a nomadic group that reigned in modern Mongolia.
During these battles political instability was generated, producing that the state of Xiongnu was divided in 2 parts and had crisis of successions, having massive revelations between its towns the Wusun, Wuhuan and Dingling.
In 60 BC Han China established the protectorate in the western regions beginning the decline of the Xiongnu reign.
I hope it helps you
