The text includes information that hunters and tourists killed Buffalo for sport, hides and skins. This threatened the survival of the Native Americans as they relied on their skin and meat for their survival.
For hundreds of years, Native Americans relied on buffalo for their survival and well-being, using every part of the buffalo for food, clothing, shelter, tools, jewelry and in ceremonies.
To Americans buffalo also represent their spirit and remind them of how their lives were once lived, free and in harmony with nature. From beard to the tail, American used every part of it.
To learn more about Native Americans,
brainly.com/question/17371177
#SPJ4
In Dalia Kirschbaum work, she uses weather data collected by NASA satellites to study landslides events.
landslides
<u>Explanation:</u>
Dalia Kirschbaum is an examination researcher who the two investigations avalanches and assists with organizing the calamity reaction when one happens. She utilizes climate information gathered by NASA satellites to contemplate avalanches occasions.
She is the GPM Applications Scientist, implying that she conveys the science and the information that she get from the GPM crucial people in general and end-clients. Dalia Kirschbaum experienced childhood in Minnesota, and she chose to seek after a zone where there truly was an absence of research.
Understanding avalanches with regards to remote detecting is quite new. We are as yet making sense of how to move toward displaying avalanche action and applying the remote detecting information NASA and different organizations gather at a bigger spatial scale.
Answer:
Doctor. Magisterium.
Explanation:
I believe this is the answer
It is the crops that did that.
Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
