All categories

1 year ago

Whose resignation from the Nixon administration was not a result of Watergate?

History

1 answer:

Crazy boy [7]1 year ago

3 0

Spiro Agnew's was not a result of Watergate.

President Richard Nixon's administration in the United States from 1972 to 1974 was embroiled in the massive political controversy known as "Watergate," which forced Nixon to resign. The scandal was caused by the Nixon administration's persistent efforts to hide its role in the June 17, 1972 break-in at the DNC headquarters at the Watergate Office Building in Washington, D.C.

The cash discovered on the five criminals at the time of their arrest was linked to the Committee for the Re-Election of the President by the media and the U.S. Justice Department. The U.S. House of Representatives granted expanded investigative jurisdiction to the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary after new investigations and revelations made during the burglars' later trials to inquire on "some things within its purview" and prompted the formation of the U.S. Senate's Watergate Committee.

The subsequent Senate Watergate hearings sparked popular attention and were broadcast "gavel-to-gavel" on PBS across the country. There was a voice-activated recording system in the Oval Office, according to witnesses, and Nixon approved plans to hide his administration's involvement in the break-in. Nixon's administration rejected the investigation's inquiries throughout, which caused a constitutional crisis.

Learn more about Watergate here:

brainly.com/question/11778920

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

How does Eisenhower describe the<br> "hostile ideology" we are facing??

gladu [14]

Answer:

President Eisenhower believed that the United States had "to maintain balance" between defense spending and the needs of a healthy economy.

Explanation:

In his speech, Eisenhower warned that the United States faced a "hostile ideology" global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose," and must bear "without complaint the burdens of a long and complex struggle."

4 0

3 years ago

Typically, what percentage of eligible Americans votes in national elections?

kirill [66]

The correct answer is D. 70% or below

Explanation:

The term national elections refer to mainly the elections of the president and vice president of the U.S. that take place every four years and in which citizens from all states of the United States are asked to vote, this date usually coincides with other federal or local elections. Even though this election system has been used for many years it has been widely criticized, one of the reason for this is the low percentage of citizens that vote in national elections as this can imply this system is not really democratic as the opinion of the majority of U.S. citizens is not reflected on the elections, in this way during the elections of 2004 the percentage of eligible population that voted was 60.1%,and in in 2008 this percentage was 61.4%, which was the highest percentage since 1968 which suggest in most election the percentage has been near to 70% or under 70%. Thus, the percentage of eligible Americans that vote on national elections is around 70% or below.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Measuring intelligence by testing is a rather new concept in the history of the world. the idea of such testing came from ______

Dominik [7]

Measuring intelligence by testing is a rather new concept in the history of the world. the idea of such testing came from France.

History is the study and record of the past. Events before the invention of the writing system are considered prehistoric. "History" is an umbrella term that includes past events and the way they are remembered, discovered, collected, organized, represented, and interpreted.

History is the study of change over time and encompasses all aspects of human society. Political, social, economic, scientific, technological, medical, cultural, intellectual, religious and military developments are all part of history.

History is the study of past events. People learn about what happened in the past by looking at things from the past, such as information sources (books, newspapers, writings, letters, etc.), buildings, artifacts (pottery, tools, coins, human or animal remains, etc.). can know

Learn more about history here:brainly.com/question/24466312

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

Why hotdogs aren’t considered sandwiches

erik [133]

To qualify as “a sandwich,” a given food product must, structurally, consist of two (2) exterior pieces that are either separate or mostly separate;

Those pieces must be primarily carbohydrate-based—so, made of bread or bread-like products;

The whole assemblage must have a primarily horizontal orientation (so, sitting flush with a plate rather than perpendicular to it); and

The whole assemblage must be fundamentally portable.

So. Under this definition, a burger is a sandwich. So is an ice cream sandwich. So is an Oreo. So is a grilled cheese. But not a hot dog

6 0

3 years ago

how did television and other innovations of the consumer age affect American politics, society, and culture in the 1950s

inysia [295]

Answer:

TV allowed people to reach nationwide audience. Due to economic boom post war, more people were open to new ideas. TV and other innovations that made life easier (like washing machines) were considered 'the good life'. Television dominated American culture during the 1950s, presenting a cookie-cutter, stereotyped image of the happy, prosperous American family. People became more productive due to these electronic developments and it contributed as one of the major reasons for them towards development and sustainability.

5 0

3 years ago