During the Constitutional Convention, a major problem of how representation was going to be counted was being debated. The bigger states and the smaller states wanted different things, along with the fact that slavery also had to be accounted for.
The New Jersey Plan was supported by the smaller states who had a lesser population. They believed that it was not fair that they should get less representation just because they had less of a population. They believed in the New Jersey Plan, which gave equal representation in the government.
The Virginia Plan was supported by the larger states who had a greater population. They believed that it was not fair that they should get the same amount of representation as states with a smaller population. They believed in the Virginia Plan, which gave representation based on population.
The Great Compromise was a compromise between the larger and smaller states. The Great Compromise created a bicameral legislature, along with the House of Representatives, which we still use today. The representation in the House of Representatives was assigned based on population and the representation in the Senate was given equal representation. This compromise made both the large and smaller states happy.
The United States embargoed scrap-metal shipments to Japan and closed the Panama Canal to Japanese shipping. This hit Japan's economy particularly hard because 74.1% of Japan's scrap iron came from the United States in 1938 :)
Answer: Many religions have holidays in order to celebrate special moments in their history or to take time to partake in their beliefs. An example is the Day of the Dead worshiping their ancestors through offerings and Christmas celebrating Jesus's birthday.
The checks and balances keep every branch of the govt. from victimization their job to induce too powerful. the perspective of Federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that a powerful national government is required to shield voters from threats, which the Constitution ought to be sanctioned like a shot to stop injury. the perspective of Anti-federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that the Constitution doesn't give enough protection for people's rights, which there's Not enough protection for powers of state governments.
