When comparing colonial slavery to nineteenth-century slavery, what was a major difference?

1 answer:

7 0

When comparing colonial slavery to nineteenth-century slavery, slaves in the nineteenth century had a stronger connection to Africa.

Slavery and enslavement are both the nation and the circumstance of being a slave, who's a person forbidden to stop their carrier for an enslaver, and who is handled by using the enslaver as their property.

Sumer or Sumeria continues to be concept to be the birthplace of slavery, which grew out of Sumer into Greece and different elements of historical Mesopotamia. The ancient East, especially China, and India, didn't undertake the exercise of slavery till an awful lot later, as past due as the Qin Dynasty in 221 BC.

Beginning in the sixteenth century, European merchants initiated the transatlantic slave trade, buying enslaved Africans from West African kingdoms and transporting them to Europe's colonies inside the Americas.

Learn more about slavery here brainly.com/question/9374853

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Which two things did civilization learn in the Middle East? agriculture mining writing telecommunications

lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

Agriculture and writing

Explanation:

While Mesopotamia's dirt was fruitful, the locale's semiarid atmosphere did not have a lot of precipitation, with under ten inches yearly. This, at first, made cultivating troublesome. Two significant waterways in the area the Tigris and Euphrates - gave a wellspring of water that empowered wide-scale cultivating.

In contrast to the more bound together civic establishments of Egypt or Greece, Mesopotamia was an accumulation of changing societies whose lone genuine bonds were their content, their divine beings, and their frame of mind toward women.