Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
Answer:
hope it's help you ok have a good day
Answer:
Ryan takes the supplier representatives out for lunch and thanks them for being such great friends.
Explanation:
Ryan taking the supplier representatives out for lunch and thanking them for being such great friends is a less-than straightforward way of saying no and ending the working relationship.
From the supplier's perspective, Ryan taking the time to take them out on a lunch would suggest he's trying to show gratitude, so as to foster their existing business relationships.
On the other hand, coming to realize that it was his way of saying no and ending the working relationship between them would make the supplier representatives disappointed and making Ryan look less-than straightforward.
Answer:
c. $8.05
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What is the value of this stock at a required return of 16.4 percent
First step is to calculate the P2
P2 = ($1.35/.164)
P2= $8.23
Now let calculate the value of the stock
P0 = [$1.23 /1.164] + [($1.25 + 8.23)/1.164^2]
P0 = $8.05
Therefore the value of this stock at a required return of 16.4 percent is $8.05
Answer and Explanation:
D. n = AP Statistics Semester 2
