Answer:
Private Savings = $4 Trillion
Explanation:
Given that
GDP = Y = 15 Trillion
Taxes = T = 1 trillion
Consumption = C = 10 trillion
Recall that
Private Savings = Y - T - C
Therefore,
Private savings = 15 - 1 - 10
= $ 4 Trillion
Answer:
$76,620.83
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows
Future Value (FV) = $100,000
Rate of interest = 10% yearly
Rate of interest (Rate) = 10%÷ 2 = 5% semiannually
Number of period (Nper) = 9 × 2 = 18
Face value = $100,000
Payment (pmt) = $100,000 × (6%÷2) = $3,000
By putting the value in excel present value formula, we get,
PV = $76,620.83
Attachment is attached below
According to the information given in the question, the best option to pursue would be early retirement.
Early Retirement presents a handy and exceptional way for assembly expectancies of a reduction in force (RIF). A reduction in force (RIF) takes place whilst a function is eliminated with no intention of changing it and effects an everlasting cut in headcount. A corporation may additionally decide to lessen its staff by means of terminating employees or by means of attrition
RIF occurs whilst a company completely eliminates positions. It is distinct from a furlough, wherein an employee's hours are quickly reduced. In the Federal government, layoffs are referred to as a reduction in force movements. When an agency should abolish positions, the reduction in force policies decides whether or not an employee keeps his or her gift position, or whether the employee has a proper to an extraordinary role.
Personnel reduction is a movement to lessen the range of personnel in a branch or in the County typical. Motives for a discount in force may additionally encompass, however, aren't constrained to reduced funding, reorganization, and/or modified workload.
Learn more about Retirement here brainly.com/question/27232329
#SPJ4
A purchase agreement is a legally binding contract that states the terms and conditions of purchasing a good/making a sale. This agreement is legally binding for both the purchaser and the seller. The agreement is contingent on being paid back at the date agreed and receiving the items that were intended to be paid for.
Answer:
The answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
In this scenario, the second option, which would be the percentage within each transaction that's also interest instead of the full amount, would've been lower if the rate of interest were lower because interest-related transactions would have been higher at lower rates and conversely, as opposed to the main refunds.
