1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tia_tia [17]
2 years ago
6

What was to fight between French and British?​

History
1 answer:
Morgarella [4.7K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire

You might be interested in
2.The Pecos Pueblo developed as a trading center over time. What evidence in the text supports the idea that this took a long ti
Ivan
The answer is (1) because of its value as trading center ect
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe all four Native American responses to the Indian removal act of 1830. Who successfully fought the act and how did they
Liula [17]

Answer:

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.[1][2][3] The act has been referred to as a unitary act of systematic genocide, because it discriminated against an ethnic group in so far as to make certain the death of vast numbers of its population.[4] The Act was signed by Andrew Jackson and it was strongly enforced under his administration and that of Martin Van Buren, which extended until 1841.[5]

7 0
3 years ago
Help plzzzzzzzzzzzz<br>​
Dmitrij [34]

2.) C

3.) D

4.) D

5.) C

6.) A

6 0
4 years ago
Why did president Roosevelt refuse to bomb auschwitz or the train tracks leading to it
Cloud [144]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

Following the refusal of the United States President, Frankli Roosevelt to bomb Auschwitz during world war II, there have been many reasons cited for such a decision. Though not all the reasons were believed to be true, here are the reasons cited:

1. It would lead to military planes ammunitions being taken away from the war front which is not feasible

2. Bombing Auschwitz might be counterproductive as it might kill more news prisoners prove.

3. There is a tendency for such actions might aggravate the anger of the German soldiers.

4 0
3 years ago
letter to doreen lawrence about her son Stephen Lawrence who got murdered by racist white people. the letter has to be about you
podryga [215]

Answer:

you want us to write the letter for you?

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the end of World War l is true?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the population of georgia change after it became a royal colony
    7·2 answers
  • The rise of nationalism as South America divided into several countries happened a) at the same time b) before c) soon after d)
    10·2 answers
  • hi i am on the student board committee at my school and I'm having to ask people their thoughts on the LGBT+ community i have to
    11·1 answer
  • 2. Mabuti bang taglayin ng Diyos ang katangian ng tao?
    12·2 answers
  • In which year was the World Wide Web invented?
    14·2 answers
  • Who were they rebelling against in the Haitian Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • How did Germans view their government after the hyperinflation?
    15·2 answers
  • Describe Maya in ur OWN words
    9·1 answer
  • The restructure of Japanese social classes was a loss to-?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!