Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
Among benefits of the ethnic, language and religious diversity in Africa one may single out the ability to learn from the different ethnic groups and build interconnections between them, thus establishing a successful, well-functioning multicultural society.
Speaking about pitfalls, when one deals with such a great cultural diversity, there is always a possibility of disagreement on the cultural ground, which may in the worst case even lead to murder, for instance, when there is a collision of religious viewpoints.
The Truman Doctrine underpinned American Cold War policy in Europe and around the world. The doctrine<span> endured because it addressed a broader cultural insecurity regarding modern life in a globalized world.
</span>
Answer:
Muslims started the wars by attacking Christians, who later attacked to regain land.
