Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
They were loyal to church and nation but they were more loyal to nation
Answer:
Coastal Plains.
Explanation:
Coastal Plain's life-giving soil is good for farming.
Peanuts, tobacco, and soybeans grow well there.
The answer is authenticity. Authenticity in anthropology reflects an object's materiality and if we dig deeper into it, authenticity does not only pertains to the age of the object but also to its age-value. Age-value signifies its past experience and condition like its wear and tear and its decay and disintegration.