Gun control most likely. It has the most amount of evidence for either side
The manufacturing sector plays a huge role in, the given country's, economic stamina/wellbeing/growth. In saying so, any changes to its productivity will have an impact on a long-term basis on economic growth. In this case, the "slowdown" of labour productivity, may result in lesser demand and supply (Decrease in AD and AS). Becuase AS decreases, prices are driven higher, thus, AD decreases as consumers/households are less willing or able to afford for a high quantity. With a "slowdown" in productivity, firms may consider laying off their human resources, in an attempt to stay healthy. With less company income, there are fewer government taxes from both firms and consumers. The increase in Unemployment means an increase in government benefits. So yeah it's not good for the economy on a long-term basis.
I hope I answered your question. It's a bit jumbled here and there. But if you have further questions, regarding my response, then say so. You are very welcome to :)
Depending on the context it is used if may be either Survey or a Question but I think in this case it is a question
Hope it helps
I believe the answer is A) 10 ions of Mg and 20 ions of F
Answer:
I believe that his audience was more likely to listen to him after he spoke the affirmation shown above.
Explanation:
With the speech shown above, Henry was confirming the importance of patriotism in each and every citizen, even if the view of patriotism was contrary to the view of those who declared themselves patriots. With the speech above, he puts himself in an interesting position that can attract the attention of his audience and make the audience listen to his words. This is because in addition to defending patriotism, posing as a patriot, he criticizes the patriotism standards established at the time.
