The lasting impact of the pre-Columbian civilizations of Latin America was that these cultures influenced art and architecture of later societies.
<h3 /><h3>What was the impact of pre-Columbian civilizations?</h3>
There were several pre-Columbian civilizations in the Americas such as the Ancestral Puebloans and the Olmecs. These cililizations may have died about before the arrival of Christopher Columbus but they still influenced generations to come.
The Ancestral Puebloans influnced the architecture of the Puebloans such that the latter built structures like the former. The Olmecs influcned the architecture of the Mayans as well.
Find out more on the Ancestral Puebloans at brainly.com/question/13599176
#SPJ1
Answer:
Large-scale farming
Explanation:
According to a different source, the options that are included with this question are:
A) large profits for the original Mexican landholders.
B) a concentration on the production of cotton.
C) small family farms.
D) large-scale farming.
E) grape production.
The development of agriculture in California during the late nineteenth century was driven by enormous population growth in the state. In 1848, the population of California was approximately 15,000. By 1870, this had risen to 560,000 people. At the beginning, the need for food was satisfied through trade. However, this eventually led to a growth in in-state agriculture. The agriculture that developed took the form of large-scale farming.
Answer:
D war bc of its the hobbesian state of nature
Answer:
C. There are weak internal controls.
Explanation:
C. There are weak internal controls.
Relating to opportunities, most people commit fraud because there are weak internal control. Any organization with weak internal checks and control is more vulnarable to fraud than with strong internal control. To deter this opportunity we need to divide the responsibility. It will cause difficulty to commit the fraud.
The correct answer is B. The Paradox of Plenty (also known as the Resource Curse) refers to how the discovery an abundance of natural resources (such as oils, fossil fuels and minerals), does not necessarily mean that the nation in question will have a major economic growth, in fact, it usually results in less democracy, and worse development outcomes than countries with fewer natural resources. This impacts the country very negatively and reduces productive activity drastically.
