Answer:
The picture is attached!
Step-by-step explanation:
For c, the last bracket said (y=6) and I assumed that it is (y+6).
If it is (y-6), the answer would change, so please tell me if I am wrong.
But the rest, I hope it helps, if you have any questions, please feel free to ask me:)
BRAINLIEST would help me a lot:)
(a) since 13 is prime.
(b) , and there are 81/3 = 27 multiples of 3 between 1 and 81, which leaves 81 - 27 = 54 numbers between 1 and 81 that are coprime to 81, so
.
(c) ; there are 50 multiples of 2, and 20 multiples of 5, between 1 and 100; 10 of these are counted twice (the multiples of 2*5=10), so a total of 50 + 20 - 10 = 60 distinct numbers not coprime to 100, leaving us with
.
(d) ; there are 51 multiples of 2, 34 multiples of 3, and 6 multiples of 17, between 1 and 102. Among these, we double-count 17 multiples of 2*3=6, 3 multiples of 2*17=34, and 2 multiples of 3*17=51; we also triple-count 1 number, 2*3*17=102. There are then 51 + 34 + 6 - (17 + 3 + 2) + 1 = 70 numbers between 1 and 102 that are not coprime to 102, and so
.
Answer:
A) The researcher should reject the null hypothesis with a = .05 but not with a = .01.
Step-by-step explanation:
State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested
On this case we can assume that the researcher conduct a one right tailed test hypothesis like on this way:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
z-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".
On this case we have the value for z score given z =+1.85
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a one right tail test the p value would be:
If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given we can take a decision:
A) The researcher should reject the null hypothesis with a = .05 but not with a = .01.
YES, since the p value it's higher than the significance level of 0.01 so we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis at this significance level. And for the significance level 0.05 we have that and we can reject the null hypothesis.
B) The researcher should reject the null hypothesis with either a = .05 or a = .01.
No since the p value it's higher than the significance level of 0.01 so we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis at this significance level
C) The researcher should fail to reject H0 with either a = .05 or a = .01.
No, for the significance level of 0.05 we reject the null hypothesis since
D) This cannot be answered without additional information.
No, we have enough info to answer the question
Answer:
50 feet long
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the Pythagorean theorem to find the value of the missing side. The pythagoreon theorem only works with right triangles such as this one.
a²+b²=c²
Where a and b are length of legs (sides) of a triangle. And c is the length of the hypotenuse. The hypotenuse is the side across from the right angle.
We know by looking at the image posted in the question, that one leg of the triangle is 14 feet. And another leg is 48 feet. (Length of picnic area) (length of campground)
14²+48²=c²
Simplify
196+2304=2500
Find square root of 2500
√(2500)=50
So 14²+48²=50²
The missing side is 50 feet long. The fence is 50 feet long.
Attached is another example.
