Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
Answer:
Eduloan is a leading education finance specialist operating in Southern Africa. Committed to making education both affordable and accessible to all individuals looking to further their education. ... The Eduloan vision is to improve people's lives through financial access to education.
Explanation:
Answer: market
Explanation:
President Kim B. Clark is an economist, he was born on the 20th of March 1949 in Utah, United States of America. He was the dean of Harvard Business school and, the the fifteenth (15th) President of Brigham Young University.
President Kim B. Clark is a Professor with many awards, one of them was award given to him in the year 1994 for the best paper published in Business history.
According to him, Kim B. Clark, he said we rely MARKET to solve problems in society. That is we rely on economy, how things are bought and sold.
I believe the answer is: Individualism and federal bureaucracy
Individualism becomes a threat because it make people less likely to be involved in social issues, while federal bureaucracy would strengthen the Federal government and would take away the power to determine enacted law from the people.
The picture is not really clear