<u>Answer:
</u>
The opponents of the message expressed in the cartoon might point to the McDonald versus Chicago case to support their critique.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- According to the Supreme Court ruling in the McDonald versus Chicago case, it had been clarified that the people's right to keep and bear arms applies to the state and the federal government equally.
- Thus, the opponents of the USA Patriot Act might bring to the surface the judgment given by the Supreme Court to serve their side against the new act.
Answer: The official poverty line can be traced to Mollie Orshansky.
Explanation:
The official definition of the poverty line in the United States can be traced to an individual named Mollie Orshansky. Orshansky while working for the Social Security Administration, published an article titled “Children of the Poor” in the Social Security Bulletin in 1963. The idea was to define a poverty line that was based on the cost of a healthy diet.
Her former job was at the United States Department of Agriculture where her role was to calculate the cost of feeding a nutritionally adequate diet to a family. She found that one-third of income is spent on food by the average family. She then posited that the poverty line is the amount needed to purchase a nutritionally adequate diet, while taking the size of the family into consideration and multiplied by three.
Answer:
The Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776
This theory is called spontaneous generation: before the 1700 people believed that life could be generated spontaneously from mud or decaying meat, because they observed that, after some time, flies appeared from decay meat, leading them to the conclusion that life could be spontaneously generated.
<span>This theory was refused from both Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi: they both demonstrated, with similar experiments, that the spontaneous generation theory was false.
The experiment is quite simple, and it’s based on two pieces of meat: one is left exposed to the air, one is covered to prevent exposure. After some time, from the piece of meat exposed some flies started to appear, while the covered piece of meat was free of flies.
This result proved that the theory of spontaneous generation was false. </span>
<span>The experiment is based on a principle called “manipulated variable”: a single variable is the object of a controlled experiment, in which two test is conducted at the same time, in order to prove that the difference of results in the two tests is caused by the only different variable (in this case, the variable is the exposure to the air and the hypothesis is that the flies appeared in the decaying meat not because of spontaneous generation but because larvas where carrying out by air).
</span>