The Constitutional Convention was a meeting held in Philadelphia in order to change the Articles of Confederation because they appeared to be weak because they did not have a strong central government. In the end, they decided to make a new set of laws for the government. This was called the Constitution. The people who supported the Constitution were called the Federalists and those who didn't support the Constitution were called Anti-Federalists. They argued that the government and the president had too much power.
Hope this helps.
Answer: According to a 2009 Citizen Corps national survey, D. 29% of Americans have not prepared because they think that emergency responders will help them.
Explanation: Citizen Corps is a program that provides training to the citizens of the United States in order for them to help in case of a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.<u> A Citizen Corps national survey which was carried out in 2009 showed that 29% of Americans failed to prepare for believing that emergency responders such as the police and the firemen would help them. </u>In that way, the correct answer is D.
D. Proposition 209
Since the passing of Proposition 209 - a ballot initiative that amended the California Constitution to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, sex or ethnicity - the number of Black students admitted and enrolled to UC Berkeley has dropped despite an increase in applications , according to a UC Office of the President fact sheet.
According to the fact sheet, Black students made up 6.7% percent of all enrolled California resident freshmen in 1995 , but this figure dropped to 3.7% in 1998, just two years after Prop 209 had taken effect. In contrast, 29.5 % of California resident freshmen consisted of white students in 1995, and this figure dropped to 28.2% percent in 1998.
The president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
The correct answer is decreasing
Explanation: Marriages and all other marital relationships, whether homo or hetero-affective, cannot remain untouched and indissoluble due to the restriction of the law. This would be the same as stifling their breath, removing the air they breathe, preventing their renewal and rejuvenation, sucking their vitality.