Answer:
The best answer to the question: If Erik uses the scientific method to investigate this, what type of research would he be doing, would be, observational as full participant.
Explanation:
In observational research methods, a person simply tries to answer a question, or solve an issue, by literally observing and experimenting on the field, without making changes to what is around. The question, or issue, will be resolved as the researcher observes the development of certain characteristics that would prove, or disprove, the question being researched, or solve, or not solve, the problem for which an answer is being sought. In this case, Erik wishes to see if his previous experiences dressing in business casual attire will repeat themselves when he is in college, and so, he not only wishes to test the theory that people approaches him easily if he is dressed in business casual, rather than in another attire, but he will become the test subject himself, becoming thus, a full participant. Erik will then observe the results of his experimentation, and thus come to an answer to his query.
Answer:
The first one: Fertile soil for growing crops
The second one: They thought that Lincoln would end slavery
Explanation:
Answer: Unreliable Narrator is the one who has his credibility compromised, either by lying or by presenting a questionable sanity. By telling lies, hiding information the narrator does not act in accordance with the narrative norms of the work. However, it is difficult to measure whether the reader really understands all the norms; after all, the narrator's contradiction can only be in opposition to the reader's understanding of that fictional world.
Thus, considering a narrative as unreliable can be configured as a kind of reader strategy that directs the narrator any and all interpretive discrepancies. Therefore, to question the credibility of the narrator it is also necessary to question the individual understanding of each reader.
The unreliable narrator's procedure contributes to the works maintaining the suspense character by narrating the actions inaccurately or incorrectly. The reader is waiting for when the narrator will be unmasked by any character or at what point in the plot will be evident that the sources used by the narrator are false or false.
Answer:
Laura's lawsuit against Bolivia will most likely not prevail because of the Act of state doctrine.
Explanation:
According to this Act, a sovereign state (United States) must respect the independence of any other sovereign state (Bolivia) and, as a result, all the laws and regulations that such sovereign state sets forth. If no US dollars are allowed to enter Bolivia, US citizens traveling to such country have to change US dollars for "Bolivianos", which is the currency used in Bolivia.
In addition, a court (a US court in this case) is not entitled to hear a case where a foreign issue is involved (the fact of exchanging foreign currency). This case cannot be heard nor decided by a US court because that would interfere with the US foreign policy (with Bolivia in this case).
Answer: Fetus Movement
Explanation:
Quickening is the term that defines about the movement of the fetus felt by a pregnant women. This movement is experienced usually when a women is pregnant from range of 16 weeks to 25 weeks. Movement s can be felt in the form of kicking, swishing, fluttering etc.
According to the question, Martha is experiencing quickening while her 18 weeks pregnancy because the fetus present in her body is moving.
