The answer is positional inequality.
<span>They had more soldiers, they had more commanders, using the commanders advantage; they usually flanked Lee for easy victories.</span>
An idiot would tell you that robots would take over the world. I honestly believe we as humans have the ability to make sure we don't go that far.
People, especially most Americans, have a borderline fetish for leisure. If it makes things easy, buy it, buy it, buy it now. Likely, more advancements will be made to make sure people won't have to leave their home via conventional ways to go to work. Basically, we get even more lazy than we already are, all things considered. Not to mention new innovations for war.
Some good can come from this, however. We require an alternative to fossil fuels, so green energy will be a must in the future. Advancements in medicine will thrive, after everyone discovers that there really are cures for almost anything (there's just no money for the doctors in curing the disease, only treating it). A cleaner Earth, a better planet, a better ecosystem.
The scenario given above is an example of criterion
validation. The criterion validity is a way of measuring an outcome related to
it or it is a way of having to gain statement about a behavior of an individual
and what would likely be the result base on his or her answers.
It was called the New Frontier
