1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
1 year ago
6

Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information is considered.

Law
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]1 year ago
5 0

Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

<h3>What is economic espionage?</h3>
  • Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
  • Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
  • Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
  • Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
  • President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
  • It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
  • It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.

Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

Know more about economic espionage here:

brainly.com/question/28218496

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Should Beastiality be legilized if the animal enjoys it.
Stels [109]

Answer:

lma o yes and in my defense they can be very intriguing ;). plus they were asking for it

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
masya89 [10]

Answer:

I not able to understand question.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What if instead they allowed federal laws to enforced in state courts ?
____ [38]

Answer:

i believe the constitution would not allow for this change to occur, and if it was to be changed there would be a lot of informing inhabitants of changes to law, massive societal changes will occur from different beliefs in different states.

3 0
2 years ago
Determine if the statement is true or false.
Shtirlitz [24]
That is false I’m thinking
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 13
ivanzaharov [21]

If I remember correctly, your license gets revoked for 30 days

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Well, if you're a felon you can't own a gun but yet are civil rights state that all men shall bear arms I guess any arising mili
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the first United States President to declare war on drugs?​
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following outlines ways to protect credit card users’ rights and how their information is gathered and used?
    10·1 answer
  • Would you be willing to be a whistle blower? On what type of issue would you blow the whistle? Inflated overtime submitted on a
    10·1 answer
  • Which group would most likely investigate a person accused of election fraud in North Carolina?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the most significant result of the ruling in Marbury v. Madison? The ruling narrowed the powers of the federal governme
    6·2 answers
  • When is a soccer player penalized for an offside offense?
    10·1 answer
  • A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who
    10·1 answer
  • Researchers who ascribe to the belief that there are multiple realities to be discovered are known as
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an obligation of creditors in the debtor-creditor relationship?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!