1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ki77a [65]
2 years ago
15

Which statement best describes voting rights in the 1800s?

Law
1 answer:
STatiana [176]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C. States needed federal approval to make changes to voting laws.

You might be interested in
What was the most significant result of the ruling in Marbury v. Madison? The ruling narrowed the powers of the federal governme
Ahat [919]

Answer:

Marbury v. Madison is the cornerstone because it established the principle of judicial review.

Explanation:

Congress did not have the authority to make modifications to the Constitution through legislation because of the Supremacy Clause it prioritizes the Constitution over anything else.  

It is an important legal case.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Dr. Umberger do to prove Dr. Coppolino’s guilt?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

Murderer

Characteristics: Poisoner - Parricide

Number of victims: 1 +

Date of murder: August 28, 1965

Date of birth: 1933

Victim profile: His wife, Dr. Carmela Musetto, 32

Method of murder: Poisoning (anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride)

Location: New Jersey/Florida, USA

Status: Sentenced to life in prison on April 28, 1967. Paroled in 1979

 

Motive: So that he could marry his lover.

Crime: Coppolino was charged with killing his wife, Carmela at their home on Florida's Gulf of Mexico coast. He was also tried for murdering Colonel William E. Farber, the husband of his ex-lover Marjorie. However, he was acquitted from this offence.

Method: Coppolino gave Carmela an overdose in the form of an injection of the anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride.

Sentence: Coppolino was charged with second degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He served 12 years, before being let out for good behaviour.

Interesting facts: An overdose of succinylcholine chloride is difficult to detect in the body, as succinic acid and choline are found naturally in the body. To be able to prove this was the cause of Carmela's death, toxicologst Dr Joseph Umberger had to devise a test, which in June 1966 he succeeded in doing.

Coppolino was an experienced anaesthetist, who had had to give up work at an early age due to ill health. So he had the knowledge and the means to kill Carmela in this way.

It was claimed that Coppolino had also killed Farber in the same way. When he was exhumed, it was discovered that his cricoid cartilage was fractured, which suggested that he had been strangled. In court it was claimed that this damage could have occurred during exhumation, and that he had sufficient arteriosclerosis to have died of a heart attack, as was originally supposed.

3 0
3 years ago
Identify the sentence that uses a relative pronoun to make the second part a dependent clause.
aivan3 [116]

<u>Answer:</u>

<em>C. I dislike driving on a road that has a lot of curves. </em>

<em />

<u>Explanation:</u>

A relative clause is one sort of ward condition with a subject and action word, yet cannot remain solitary as a sentence. It is now and then called an adjective clause since it capacities like a modifier it gives more data about a thing. A relative statement consistently starts with a "relative pronoun," which substitutes for an idea, a thing, expression, or a pronoun when sentences are joined.

Restrictive relative conditions give information that characterizes the thing—data that is essential for the complete ID of the situation. Use "that" or "which" for non-human things; use "that" or "who" for human traits.  

5 0
3 years ago
Why are drugs bad if they make people happy?
fgiga [73]

Answer:

They cause death and people can go mentally insane from taking too many.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Violet handles the books for prominent doctor. She also takes cari of a box in which petty cash is kept. Every evening, while co
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

embezzlement

Explanation:

the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets, by one or more persons to whom the assets were entrusted, either to be held or to be used for specific purposes. Embezzlement is a type of financial fraud

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10 - MIJ COMPREHENSIVE SCIENCE 2 - 1ST 9 WEEKS -CR
    12·1 answer
  • What are the different terms for the judges in each system?
    5·1 answer
  • The fate of privatized prisons cannot yet be determined.<br><br> True<br> False
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Diferencie preclusão lógica do venire contra factum proprio.
    13·1 answer
  • Who tryna start a convo?
    7·2 answers
  • Argentina cuenta con un sistema presidencialista?
    15·1 answer
  • Developing appropriate attitudes depends on recognizing that attitudes are _.
    14·1 answer
  • What makes administrative law different from other types of law?
    5·2 answers
  • What<br> can Congress do to check the President?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!