Answer:
Chief of State.
Explanation:
Among numerous titles or responsibilities aside from being the president of the United States, one important responsibility is that of being the Head of State or Chief of State. This means that the President is the Head of the State, in this case, the country America.
The Head/ Chief of State is responsible for performing various jobs like welcoming dignitaries of foreign countries, hosting dinners, attending ceremonies that promote the country's values, and also represent the nation to other countries.
Thus, the correct answer is the Chief of State.
The answer to this question will be D
Answer:
Maybe c) is the answer cuz they didn't take any action regarding this issue
Answer:
The only way to overturn the Supreme Court's ruling that flag burning is protected speech is through a constitutional amendment.
Explanation:
Flag Desecration Amendment was brought proposed in June 27, 2006 but it failed. It is a proposed law to amend the Bill of Rights that would allow the U.S congress to prohibit dishonouring of the of the flag of the US and punish those who are involved in any such act.
The debate over protecting it as a national symbol and considering its physical desecration as the freedom of speech is still going on. If the amendment gets ratified it would prohibit all forms o flag dishonouring.
The supreme court has ruled in several cases that due to the First Amendment of the US constitution flag desecration cannot be prohibited by federal,municipal or state government.
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
