I would say these two examples show a type of performance evaluation ie analyzing what was successful and why or alternatively what was not successful and why so as to learn from the experience to continue to perform well in the future or to change poor performance to good performance.
It should be noted that the inefficient allocation if resources is market failure.
<h3>What is market failure? </h3>
It should be noted that market failure simply means the inefficient distribution of goods and services.
Market failure is the the inability of a market to bring about the allocation of resources that best satisfies the wants of society.
Learn more about market failure on:
brainly.com/question/368647
Answer:
Investor A = $545216 .
Investor B = $352377
Investor C = $897594
Explanation:
Annual rate ( r ) = 9.38%
N = 41 years
<u> Calculate the balance at age of 65</u>
1) For Investor A
balance at the end of 10 years
= $2000 (FIA, 9.38 %, 10) (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $33845
Hence at the end of 65 years ( balance )
= $33845 (FIP, 9.38 %, 31) ≈ $545216 .
2) For investor B
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 31) = $322159 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $352377
3) For Investor C
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 41) = $820620 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $897594
Answer:
change; over-estimates
Explanation:
Substitution bias refers to a tendency in which economic index numbers don't include information about the changes in consumer spending when they switch expensive products for cheaper ones or buy less units as prices change. This changes are not reflected in the market basket from which the CPI is built which can cause inflation rates to be over-estimated.
