*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer: A, file a claim
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The given data is as follows:
Error rate = 4%, per hour payment of inspector = $8, inspection of units = at the rate of 49 per hour, cost = $9 per unit
The problem can be solved as considering an opportunity to have an improvement of 4% in the quality.
In case inspector is not hired then it will cost .04 multiply 9= $.3.6 per unit and in case the inspector is hired it will cost $ 0.163 approx.(8 divided by 49).
Therefore, on comparison, it is recommended to hire the inspector.
Firms pursuing a global standardization strategy focus on the realization of location and experience curve economies.
<h3>What is
a global standardization strategy?</h3>
The capacity to apply standardized marketing messaging and campaigns across markets, regions, and cultures is referred to as a global standardization strategy. Global standardization is used by the world's largest brands, such as Adidas and Coca-Cola, to offer a consistent brand experience across countries and languages.
For example, the Coca-Cola Company uses global standardization in marketing by keeping the product's presentation largely consistent throughout markets. Even though several languages are shown on the items, the corporation uses the same design motif.
These advantages include cost reduction, international price reduction, competitive decrease, market position consolidation, and promotion of a distinct international image.
To know more about global standardization strategy follow the link:
brainly.com/question/17159333
#SPJ4
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
I believe that the main thing here that can favor my company is if there's documentation for every process involved with my dealings with Regina Fabrics.
This could have been solved if she didn't reject the cash that was offered to her company after two months, so there should be a formal documents that shows that she rejected the cash which should be acknowledged and signed by her. Also, the monthly payments received by her should be documented as well.
With regards to the above, if there is a formal documentation in place, then I won't have to pay as the guaranty but if this isn't in place, then I may have to pay since there won't be evidences against her.
Answer:
Answer is given below.
Explanation:
it is absolutely exploitative to adjust the maturing of the records receivable with no legitimate explanation so as to diminish the remittance made so as to expand the benefit and show an off base monetary record figures to the partners. The controller can't subjectively choose to change the records receivable to cut down the noncollectable records as at some point or another a similar will be found during review and a similar will be hailed off as a fake. The long haul results you would confront incorporate landing terminated from the position, having your authorized dropped in the event that you are CPA and may likewise confront lawful prosecutions. You should disclose to the controller that so as to simply introduce a decent benefit for the present year it can place into the danger for the future and put their vocation in question. Additionally, a similar won't be valued by the investors and the organization may go on free its altruism.
