1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
2 years ago
14

Dr. Nick, the local surgeon, is called to the hospital to remove Derrick’s appendix. Unbeknownst to Derrick, who is in extreme d

iscomfort, Dr. Nick is seriously intoxicated. During the surgery, Dr. Nick – true to his name – nicks an artery because his intoxicated condition is creating double vision. Derrick suffers severe blood loss, falls into a coma and dies eight months later. A nurse rats out Dr. Nick to the medical board and to the local district attorney. The district attorney would be correct in charging Dr. Nick with:
a. intoxication manslaughter
b. criminally negligent homicide
c. no offense because the death was unintended
d. no offense because too much time has passed between the surgery and Derrick’s death
Law
1 answer:
MA_775_DIABLO [31]2 years ago
6 0

The district attorney would be correct in charging Dr. Nick with a  criminally negligent homicide.

<h3>What is a negligent homicide?</h3>

This refers to the criminal charge brought against a person who, through criminal negligence that allows another person to die.

When Dr Nicks. nicks an artery because his intoxicated condition is creating double vision and cause Derrick to suffers severe blood loss, falls into a coma and dies eight months later, he has committed a negligent homicide.

Hence, the district attorney would be correct in charging Dr. Nick with a  criminally negligent homicide.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about negligent homicide

brainly.com/question/6228473

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How much is law school a year?
Wewaii [24]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

<em><u>(16,800-$34,300 on average)-based on if its public or private.</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

<em><u>Thank you for asking this great question need any other help please let me know by commenting below I'd be glad to help.</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

<em><u> I'd also greatly appreciate you if you mark me as brainliest and click that thanks button.( optional )</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

<em><u>Your brainly friend ( lauralit1 )</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The declaration of independence reflects the principle of
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Popular Sovereignty.

Explanation:

The principle of popular sovereignty state that it is the consent of the people that creates and sustains the state and its government through the elected representatives.

The people are source of all political power. this principle is associated with Thomas Hobbs, Rousseau and John Locke, all three were social contract philosophers. Declaration of independence also reflects this principle because it declare that it is the prole who instituted the government for themselves and it derives power from their consent.

7 0
3 years ago
did u know that brainly tracks u because when u make a new account u still have to buy there trial yes or no did u know this
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

No?

Explanation:

But that's the truth, i did not know about this as Brainly didn't say about this themselves. That didn't come in mind to me as I know in general thought, anyone could track you no matter what app or website you use.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should Congress have the power to refuse to vote on a justice nominee? Why or why not?
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.

Explanation:

For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.

6 0
3 years ago
Disagreement at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 over the Virginia
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

created a Congress made up of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise created two legislative bodies in Congress.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Will Trump win the 2020 reelection? How has he helped you or harmed you personally?
    15·2 answers
  • Voting laws are controlled by the us constitution and...
    12·1 answer
  • Tell of the Supreme Court's responsibility in interpreting the Constitution -- in other words, why does the U.S. Constitution pl
    14·1 answer
  • Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a factor that causes a change in supply?
    14·1 answer
  • Legislative Branch
    5·1 answer
  • Hi everyone
    7·1 answer
  • For what type of job did Paul Jobs go to night school?​
    5·2 answers
  • Wg=hy is 100 gecs so bad
    10·1 answer
  • 21. Education promotes all of the following EXCEPT
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!