Answer: The price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in a increase in total revenue for good A
Explanation:
The following can be deduced form the question:
P1 = $50
P2 = $70
Q1 = 500 units
Q2 = 400 units
Percentage change in quantity = [Q2 - Q1 / (Q2 + Q1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
Percentage change in price = [P2 - P1 / (P2 + P1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
% change in quantity = (400 - 500)/(400 + 500)/2 × 100
= -100/450 × 100
= -22.22%
% change on price = (70 - 50)/(70 + 50)/2 × 100
= 20/60 × 100
= 33
Price elasticity of demand = % change in quantity / % change on price
= -22.22 / 33
= -0.67
This means that a 1% change in price will lead to a 0.67% change in quantity demanded. As there was a price change, there'll be a little change in quantity demanded because demand is inelastic. Thereby, he increase in price will lead to an increase in the total revenue.
Therefore, the price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in an increase in total revenue for good A
Answer:
Efficient market school.
Explanation:
Efficient market school is the market school which argues that forward exchange rates do the best possible job for forecasting future spot exchange rates, so investing in exchange rate forecasting services would be a waste of time because it is impossible to have a consistent alpha generation on a risk adjusted excess returns basis as market prices are only affected by new informations.
The efficient market school also known as the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis that states that asset (share) prices reflect all information and it is very much impossible to consistently beat the market.
Also, forward exchange rates are exchange rates controlling foreign exchange transactions at a specific future date or time.
<em>Hence, according to the efficient market school it would be a waste of time investing in exchange rate forecasting services because all the information about an asset or security is already factored into their prices and as a result of the randomness of the market. </em>
Answer:
2016 2015 2014 2013
gross profit% 26.29% 22.58% 22.45% 22.41%
Inventory turnover 6.58 7.64 7.6 7.94
cost of material % 59.89% 51.76% 89.82% 51.10
b. gross% has increased this may be due to a high demand, and intense marketing.
inventory turnover has decreased this may be due to new competition, or introduced product(new product)
cost of material purchased % it has increased in 2016, this may be due to increased production and effective use of material.
Explanation:
gross profit % =gross profit/ sales
gross profit = sales less cost of sales
inventory turnover = cost of sales / average inventory
average inventory = (opening inventory + closing inventory )/2
cost of material purchased/ cost of finished goods
finished goods = cost of sales + closing - opening goods
