When you create the number line, put 0 in the middle. Basically you put all the numbers you got from least to greatest on the number.
Since -3/2 is less than 0, it will go to the left of 0.
Since 3/2 and 5/2 are greater than 0, it will go to the right of 0.
Remember to use sub points of 1.
Best of Luck!
Answer:
As the lines are not intersecting nor parallel, they must be skew.
Step-by-step explanation:
Question is incomplete, we consider the nearest match available online.
Parametric equations of two lines are:
L₁ : x=4t+2 , y = 3 , z =-t+1
L₂: x=2s+2 , y= 2s+5 , z = s+1
If lines are parallel then parametric coordinates must be equal scalar multiple of each other which s not true here.

If lines are intersecting then parametric coordinates must be equal for some value of t and s.

Hence the lines are not intersecting nor parallel, they must be skew.
Answer:
x = 55
Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps.
Don't forget to click the Brainliest button if you like my answer.
The missing statement in the proof is ∠1 ≅ ∠4.
Solution:
(1) Given ∠1 ≅ ∠2
(2) ∠1 and ∠4 are vertical angles.
<u>Vertical angle theorem:
</u>
If two angles are vertically opposite then they are congruent.
By vertical angle theorem,
⇒ ∠1 ≅ ∠4
(3) <u>Transitive property of congruence:</u>
If A = B and B = C, then A = C.
From (1) and (2), ∠2 ≅ ∠4.
(4) If two lines and a transversal form congruent corresponding angles, then the lines are parallel.
Therefore line a || line b.
⇒ a || b.
Hence the missing statement in the proof is ∠1 ≅ ∠4.
24 minutes.
Let me explain.
The lawn can be any size, but for the purpose of simplicity, let's say it's 240 square meters.
Peter mows 6 square meters per minute if he mows 240 square meters in 40 minutes.
John mows 4 square metres each minute if he mows 240 square metres in 60 minutes.
They'll mow 10 square meters per minute if they work together.
As a result, mowing the entire lawn will take them 24 minutes.
(Note that the location is irrelevant as long as we know how long each man takes to complete the task separately.) The answer would be the same if the field was 1 million hectares in size.)
I hope this helps.