Answer:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc which is informal fallacy.
Explanation:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc which can be most time termed as pos hoc fallacy, is an informal type of fallacy, which determine conclusion based on the order of events occurrence alone, instead of considering other possible factors that might rule out the connection.
It is expressed as "Since A occurred, then B occurred. Therefore, A is the cause of B."
In other words, since the event B occurred after event A, event B was caused as a result of event A occurrence.
Another example is : The team always lose a match whenever they wear white jersey. Therefore, the white jersey causes the team to lose
I believe the answer is: <span>practicality
The issues of practicality in this context refers to how well the action that being promoted by the speaker would solve the issue.
To address this issue, it is very common for speaker in a persuasive speech to fully explain the specific disadvantage and advantages of each available options.
</span>
I believe the answer is: <span>intermediate sanctions.
People who are punished with </span><span>intermediate sanctions. usually, have to be monitored by government officials throughout the day even though they're not placed in jail. This usually is done by requiring them to give reports on their location every couple of hours and require them to find a job through government agencies.</span>
He transformed Egypt by establishing a dramatic reforms in the economic, military and cultural spheres and he also introduced a violent cleansing of Mamluks, consolidating his rule and completely ending the Mamluk hold over Egypt
