Answer:
<h3>No, as a reader, I wasn't able to remain equally nonjudgmental as Jeanette.</h3>
Explanation:
I wasn't able to remain equally nonjudgmental as Jeanette because she was brought up in a family where she thinks that her parents had done much more for her than she deserves.
Jeanette refuses to condemn her parents because she is sentimentally connected to them so much. As a reader, I feel that her parents have failed to protect her from sexual predators as they thought that it was normal when in reality it was their duty to protect her from any potential threat.
Jeanette also feels that she should not confront her parents with her personal problems. However, it is rather the parents who have made it 'normal' for her to feel that some things are meant to just 'let it slip'. This is why I think her parents have failed in my perspective.
It should be A hope i helped
The appropriate response is life estate. An existence home is a responsibility for the term of a man's life. In legitimate terms, it is a home in genuine property that closures at the demise when responsibility for the property may return to the first proprietor, or it might go to someone else.
The nexus requirement holds that an act that is considered joint activity must have some relationship to the act of justice that the defendant is seeking to avoid.
The prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted on the basis of common sense necessary for the crime when he committed the voluntary act (or unlawful omission) necessary for the crime.
An error as to material fact may give rise to reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed the degree of nexus requirements in the human common sense necessary to impose criminal responsibility so that such an error would be considered a lack of evidence. It is true that it is sometimes used as a defense.
Learn more about nexus requirements at
brainly.com/question/20736948
#SPJ4
Answer:
spinal cord
Explanation:
In 1965 Melzack and Wall proposed the gate-control theory to explain the phenomena related to pain. This theory suggests the presence of a mechanism at the level of the central nervous system that opens or closes the pain pathways.
The transmission of afferent (sensitive) nerve impulses is modulated by a gate system, located in the posterior antlers of the spinal cord.