Answer:
I think the answer is 18 square or 324.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since m < 1 and m < 2 are complementary angles wherein the measure of their angles add up to 90°, we can establish the following equation:
m < 1 + m < 2 = 90°
x° + 48° + 2x° = 90°
Combine like terms:
48° + 3x° = 90°
Subtract 48° from both sides:
48° - 48° + 3x° = 90° - 48°
3x = 42°
Divide both sides by 3 to solve for x:
3x/3 = 42/3
x = 14°
Plug in the value of x into the equation to fins m< 1 and m < 2:
m < 1 + m < 2 = 90°
(14° + 48°) + 2(14)° = 90°
62° + 28° = 90°
90° = 90° (True statement)
Therefore:
m < 1 = 62°
m < 2 = 28°
Answer:
48 students.
Step-by-step explanation:
25% of total students = 12
suppose,
total students= x
so,
25% of x=12
(25/100)*x=12
25*x=(12*100)
x=1200/25
x=48
therefore,
x= total students= 48.
<12> starting number <75%> next number your new hourly rate would be higher also know as 75% more meaning the answer to how much more i would get is <12> + <75> = <87>
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs.
here obs.T=1.879
we accept 
at 5% level of significance.
i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.
1.
this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.
Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.
we assume that 
independently
We want to test 
define 
now 
the hypothesis becomes
in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before
i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .
