Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

Excerpt from Areojet Corporation Per Unit Per Month Selling price $ 200,000 Direct materials 40,000 Direct labor 10,000 Variable

manufacturing overhead 2,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 140,000 Variable selling and administrative expenses 20,000 Fixed selling and administrative expenses 40,000 January February March Beginning inventory 0 0 3 Units produced 4 5 2 Units sold 4 2 5 Ending inventory 0 3 0 What is the unit product cost for the month of February, using the absorption costing method? 52,000 80,000 87,000 122,000

1 answer:

Yuri [45]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Absorption Cost $192,000

Variable Cost $52,000

Explanation:

Areojet Corporation

Absorption Costing

Unit Product Cost

Direct materials 40,000

Direct labor 10,000

Variable manufacturing overhead 2,000

Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 140,000

Absorption Cost $192,000

Areojet Corporation

Variable Costing

Unit Product Cost

Direct materials 40,000

Direct labor 10,000

Variable manufacturing overhead 2,000

Variable Cost $52,000

You might be interested in

During 2011, Clark Company manufactured equipment for its own use at a total cost of $2,400,000. The project required the entire

Zanzabum

Idk idk idk idk idk idk im sorry btw its just for the starting thing

8 0

3 years ago

Joint products A and B emerge from common processing that costs $116,000 and yields 4,000 units of Product A and 2,800 units of

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

Apportioned joint cost to A=$92,800

Explanation:

<em>Joint costs are the costs incurred up until the split-off where two or more products result from the same production process. These common costs need to be apportioned among the joint products using any of the following basis:</em>

physical units
Relative sales value basis.

The relative value basis apportions joint costs using the proportion of product individual sales value to the the total sales value.

Total sales value = (280×4,000) + (100×2,800) =1400000

Apportioned joint cost to A =(1,120,000/1,400,000)× 116,000=92800

Apportioned joint cost to A=$92,800

4 0

3 years ago

The cost of using/borrowing money is reflected in the

spayn [35]

Interest rate? Repayment amounts? Length of time of loan? Smile on the face of the money lender? Might there be a little more to this quesition?

8 0

3 years ago

If the quantity of good A (Q A) is plotted along the horizontal axis, the quantity of good B (Q B) is plotted along the vertical

kozerog [31]

Answer:

The slope of the consumer's budget constraint is -PA/PB.

Explanation:

The quantity of good A (Q A) is plotted along the horizontal axis, the quantity of good B (Q B) is plotted along the vertical axis.

The price of good A is PA, the price of good B is PB and the consumer's income is I.

The budget line represents the maximum possible bundles of two goods that a consumer can afford by spending his total income. The slope of the budget line will be the ratio of the prices of two goods. It represents the quantity of a good that the consumer needs to sacrifice to increase the consumption of the other good.

So the slope of the budget constraint will be -PA/PB.

3 0

3 years ago

Suppose that the equilibrium price of greeting cards declined at the same time the equilibrium quantity of greeting cards increa

lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

The answer is: A) A decrease in the price of paper used to make greeting cards.

Explanation:

In normal market conditions, an increase in the equilibrium quantity of greeting cards means that the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied of greetings cards increased. Usually an increase in the quantity supplied will result in an increase of the price of the good or service. But on this specific case something else made the price of the cards decrease. The only one of the four possible options that can explain an external cause for a decrease in the price of greetings cards, is a decrease in the price of paper used to manufacture them.

3 0

3 years ago