1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Over [174]
2 years ago
10

Pamela sues Darin in Texas state court alleging that Darin severely injured her in a car accident. In preparation for the trial,

Pamela (and her attorney if she has one), try to locate a particular witness to the accident, but are unsuccessful. At trial, the court rules in favor of Danny. Pamela is upset and manages to locate the witness about a week after the trial. The witness can testify that they saw Darin driving erratically and that he clearly caused the accident. If Pamela appeals the case, which of the following are true?
Law
1 answer:
Maru [420]2 years ago
5 0

If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.

<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>

Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.

This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.

Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Violet handles the books for prominent doctor. She also takes cari of a box in which petty cash is kept. Every evening, while co
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

embezzlement

Explanation:

the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets, by one or more persons to whom the assets were entrusted, either to be held or to be used for specific purposes. Embezzlement is a type of financial fraud

4 0
2 years ago
What court case gave the supreme court the power of judicial review
Katarina [22]

Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.

In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.

The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.  

6 0
3 years ago
How did watching the debate (Vice president 2020) challenge or complicate your previous opinions on the candidates or the campai
Mariulka [41]
Hindi ko po maindihan ipik yonalang
6 0
3 years ago
1. The Bill of Rights
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

. The Bill of Rights

the rights of every citizen.

2. Freedom of

allows people to gather and share their

opinions.

3. In order for accused people to receive fair treatment, the Fifth Amendment

has a

clause.

4. The Fifth Amendment protects people from

so that they

cannot be tried twice for the same crime.

5. People are allowed to

the government

and ask for changes.

6. People who are born or

in the United States can vote.

7. The Nineteenth Amendment is for woman

8. A President can only be elected to two

8 0
2 years ago
1) Do you think the government should be allowed to restrict certain
Mama L [17]

Answer:

1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.

2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is the US government agency responsible for gathering Information about other countries?
    11·2 answers
  • Is the number of democrats and republicans the same in Senate and House?
    15·1 answer
  • A pretrial stage to hear indictment and allow a plea
    15·1 answer
  • What age do you have to be to get a business bank account
    11·2 answers
  • The States Leader is called
    12·1 answer
  • Who is this boy i want to know
    13·1 answer
  • 31. "Stand Your Ground" means what? (Read answer choices carefully)
    8·2 answers
  • The President and Congress both have control over war powers
    15·1 answer
  • the US presidential election is determined by the people and which of the following? A.) the senate B.) the supreme court C.) th
    14·1 answer
  • Question 28: There is an old saying that it’s better for 100 guilty people to go free than for an innocent person to be unjustly
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!