The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one
I think its the second one
Answer:
B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes.
Explanation:
The United States Postal Inspection Service is a federal law enforcement sector of the posting service that inspects and makes sure that the mail system is used in a fair and safe manner. This process safeguards the general public from any harm and also ensures the mail system from any illegal or dangerous activity.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is that the US Postal Inspection Service was created so that the national mail system will not be used for any criminal or illegal purposes and also to safeguard people from any harm.</u>
Answer:
when there is red and green light with white light, it means the vessel encountered at anchor has the engine running.
Correct Answer : Option C
Explanation:
the red and green lights are the sidelights of the boat. the red light indicate the port of the vessel whereas the green light indicate the starboard of the vessel. these serves as the combination lights as they can be seen from the approaching boat either when approaching from sides or when approaching head on position.
the white light indicates the mast head light or stern light. they can be seen when approached from back nearly when behind the vessel in case of stern light. Mast light is seen from the front. they altogether indicate that the engine is running.
Answer:
Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.
Explanation:
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.
