Who has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a federal law or action is constitutional?.

1 answer:

6 0

Supreme court has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a federal law or action is constitutional.

What is the role of Supreme court ?

For all issues and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States, the Court is the highest tribunal in the country. The Supreme Court serves as the final arbiter of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter.
According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in idea and function." Few other courts in the world have the same constitutional interpretation authority, and none have used it as extensively or for as long.
The strong adherence of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government is a major contributor to the Supreme Court's unique position.

To know more about Supreme court visit:

brainly.com/question/2528721

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Joan is a white-collar offender. She has been convicted of embezzlement and given a prison sentence. In terms of security levels

Katen [24]

Answer: C

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

What did the supreme court rule in the dred scott case?.

user100 [1]

They said that he was a slave and it didn’t matter that he had traveled to a free territory he would still be a slave. they also said that African Americans didn’t have to right to citizenship

5 0

2 years ago

Suzy loaded her .38 caliber pistol, snuck out the back door, and, unknown to Bob, with finger on the trigger aimed directly at h

Rudik [331]

Answer:

Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.

Explanation:

Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.

This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.

7 0

2 years ago

The attempt to develop a means for determining the values of a society is known as

vichka [17]

Ethics 2, he attempt to develop a means for determining the values of society is known as ethics. 2. An action or law that conflicts with the most fundamental law of the nation and is, therefore, no longer valid, is said to be unconstitutional

8 0

2 years ago

Lois considers herself an act utilitarian. Accordingly, which of the following statements is Lois most likely to make?

Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

Correct Answer:

A. "It may be O.K. to violate someone’s rights if the good you produce outweighs the harm caused by the violation."

Explanation:

Utilitarian theory is a moral theory whereby an individual views the morality of an action being done as either good or bad based on the effect it would have. For example, is the dropping of bomb in an area in the cause of war.

This could be viewed by some people as morally right since it will kill people but at same time stop the ongoing war rather than a situation where the war continues on the long run.

4 0

3 years ago