Answer:
언론의 자유와 정부의 법률 관행 규정 사이의 갈등을 식별, 토론 및 해결
Explanation:
THERE YOU GO
Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
Answer:
After deliberation, a jury reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict.
Explanation:
used when jurors cant decide on a verdict, and dislodge jurors from entrenched positions
-example Allen v US 164 U.S 492 (1896)
hope this helps
Answer:
d. Whether the statute has a secular legislative purpose and whether the statute's principal or primary effect either advances or inhibits religion; and also whether the statute fosters an excessive government entanglement with religion
Explanation:
The establishment clause is related to the first amendment of the US constitution. This clause refers to the freedom of religion that should be allowed in the country, as it states that the government is prohibited from establishing and imposing a single religion on all citizens of the country, as well as preventing citizens from following the religion they desire. .
Accordingly, whether the statute has a secular legislative objective and whether the primary or primary effect of the statute promotes or inhibits religion; and also if the statute promotes excessive government involvement with religion means that the government statute is violating the Establishment Clause.
