It could be either, we need more info. How big are each? If it doesn't say, then it's a trick question. Throw Schrodinger's cat at it or something.
Answer:
20°
Step-by-step explanation:
Rotating the figure through an angle equal to the central angle of one "sector" will do the required mapping. That is 360°/18 = 20°.
Answer:
The graph in the attached figure
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
----> inequality A
solve for y


The solution of the inequality A is the shaded area above the dashed line
The slope of the dashed line is positive
The y-intercept is the point 
The x-intercept is the point 
----> inequality B
The solution of the inequality B is the shaded area below the dashed line
The slope of the dashed line is positive
The y-intercept is the point 
The x-intercept is the point 
Using a graphing tool
The solution of the system of inequalities in the attached figure
Answer:
-9+x=-20
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not so positive on this one, but if you are not doing inequalities, then this should be correct.
"More than" would insinuate that you are adding. In this class, you would have a number to replace that x, but since no number was given, you place the x in its place. x=-11, because when you "add" -9 with something to get -20, it would have to be -11. Negative numbers can be confusing because when you subtract a negative number by another negative, you end up with a negative. Like in this case. Normally, you would just put -11, so it would look like -9 - 11 = -20. But since this says "more than", unless you are doing inequalities, you add.
If you are doing inequalities, then your answer should be this:
-9 > x = -20
I hope this helps!
-No one