Answer:
Appeal to Unqualified Authority.
Explanation:
Appeal to unqualified authority fallacy is a logical fallacy that deals with arguments presented by someone in authority but is not qualified but still make unsound logic. In other words, we can say appeal to unqualified authority is when a person makes an argument about an issue that is just one-sided and or biased, and that person has o special qualification to make that appeal.
In the given circumstance, Mary believes that Betty's opinion of creationism as false is true. But the main fallacy is that Betty has a Ph.D. in biology but does not have the expertise to comment or make claims on religion or creation. This appeal by Mary is from an unqualified authority, that is Betty in this case.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
Answer:
Hey mate....
Explanation:
This is ur answer.....
<em>Nonvascular plants are plants that do not have any special internal pipelines or channels to carry water and nutrients. Instead, nonvascular plants absorb water and minerals directly through their leaflike scales. Nonvascular plants are usually found growing close to the ground in damp, moist places.</em>
Hope it helps!
Brainliest pls.....
Follow me! ;)
Answer: unwarranted implication
Explanation:
Unwarranted implication is when someone is alluding to a particular thing even though it's not been said directly.
Bias occurs when one is leaning towards a particular side in an argument.
Emotional appeal is when an individual is trying to gain favor of win an argument by manipulating the emotions of others.
Therefore, the answer above is an unwarranted implication.
