If you don’t give the passage then no one can help you
(I’m not just trying to get points reply to this with the passage and ill help)
It's an opinion because it is a belief based on the perspective that the government should be involved in stopping the extinction of animals.
Answer:
A conclusion that is in favour:
"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.
Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".
