Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Dissociative identity disorder is the mental and personality disorder in which a person tends to behaves in having two or more different personalities.
Host personality persisting person in case of dissociative identity disorder has most leading personality and the other personality apart from host is called alter. Alter identity persist distinct names, behavior etc.
According to the question personality of Brigid is host and thus he cannot persist alter personalities in dissociative identity disorder.Alter cases are different from Brigid's situation.
Other options are incorrect because Brigid's case is not similar or likely with alter identity as he has host identity and can be present in stressful situation .Thus, the correct option is option(B).
Anthony garcia
I found on google :)
Answer:
not an example but steps
Explanation:
State your thesis (1 sentance)
rephrase main key details(2-3 sentances)
end with a concluding sentance (1 sentance)
example of a concluding sentance
Because abraham lincoln was smart, that helped him be successful as a president