Answer:
A. Reject (Alternative 1) $0.00
Accept (Alternative 2) $1.12
Differentials Effect on income (Alternative 2) $1.12
B. Accepted (Alternative 2)
Explanation:
a. Preparation of a differential analysis dated March 16 on whether to reject (Alternative 1) or accept (Alternative 2) the special order.
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Reject (Alternative 1) or Accept (Alternative 2)
March 16
Reject Accept Differentials Effect on income
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2) (Alternative 2)
Revenue per unit $0.00 $7.20 $7.20
Costs:
Variable manufacturing costs per unit
$0.00 -$5.00 -$5.00
Export tariff per unit
$0.00 -$1.08 -$1.08
($7.20*15%=$1.08)
Income (Loss) per unit $0.00 $1.12 $1.12
b. Based on the above differential analysis
the special order should be ACCEPTED (Alternative 2).
D. Resourcefulness; if you can pick more than one than also chose A. Confidence.
Answer:
Export management companies
Explanation:
Export management companies acst as the export sales department for a manufacturer.
Export management companies refers to firms that helps in the distribution of goods produced by other firm's in the international market. They export goods on behalf of other firm's.
Export management companies are independent companies that provides support services for other firms engaged in exporting. Services rendered by export management companies includes: insuring, billing, shipping, warehousing among others.
They also help to provide important information that will improve the quality of product to firms who hire them.
<span>The simple answer here is you never want to over commit any part of your portfolio. Every single successful investor has a wide variety of investment holdings. This is known as diversification. If you place all of your "eggs in one basket," so to speak, if that investment were to play against you, your losses may be much higher than anticipated or often irrecoverable. With a diverse portfolio, when one small portion of your investment strategy fails, you can count on other, more successful aspect to make up the difference.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is: he lacked the mental capacity to enter into the contract.
Explanation:
A person may ratify a contract that he or she established while intoxicated after becoming sober, and therefore become fully responsible for it. Though, if that person wants to reject the contract, proof of mental lack of capacity must be provided to dissolve the contract and any responsibility inherent.
