1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
daser333 [38]
3 years ago
6

In comparing the current ratios of two companies, why is it invalid to assume that the company with the higher current ratio is

the better company?
Business
1 answer:
klio [65]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: I found the options:

A. The current ratio includes assets other than cash.

B. A high current ratio may indicate inadequate inventory on hand.

C. The two companies may define working capital in differentterms.

D. A high current ratio may indicate inefficient use of various assetsand liabilities.

Explanation: The correct answer is "D. A high current ratio may indicate inefficient use of various assets and liabilities."

Is invalid to assume that the company with the higher current ratio is te better company because a high current ratio may indicate inefficient use of various assets and liabilities, That is why it would be convenient to observe other ratios that can help us compare more fully the 2 companies.

You might be interested in
Which of the following provides the best example of a systematic-risk event? A. A strike by union workers hurts a firm's quarter
shutvik [7]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

From the various options listed, the one that would be considered a systematic-risk event would be if the Federal Reserve increases interest rates 50 basis points. This is mainly because this event would cause various entire markets to be affected, as increasing the reserve interest rates causes the value of the country's currency to devalue and become more expensive to make purchases as well as obtain loans. Therefore affecting a wide range of entire markets throughout the country.

8 0
3 years ago
1. On June 30, 2018, the Johnstone Company purchased equipment from Genovese Corp. Johnstone agreed to pay Genovese $21,000 on t
Mumz [18]

Answer:

$58,002.60

Explanation:

First, it is clear to include the $21,000 as part of the value of the equipment.

Now, the $9,000 annual payment after every year for six years need to be presented in its present value, meaning what is the value of those future amounts of $9,000 on June 30, 2018.

To calculate the present value of annuity (annuity means constant and equal payments) for those 6 payments of $9,000, we would need the Present Value Factor which is supplied from the Present Value Table.

Looking at 12% for 6 periods ("six annual installments") on the table, it gives the PV factor of 4.1114.

Just multiply $9,000 by 4.1114 and we get 37,002.60

Finally add the downpayment of $21,000 with the present value $37,002.60 and we would get the total value of the equipment of 58,002.60

5 0
3 years ago
Tru or false? the older traditional form of management structure is the horizontal organization
Tamiku [17]
The answer is false.
7 0
3 years ago
A speaker says, "because the japanese make the best stereo sound systems in the world, you should consider buying a japanese-mad
Advocard [28]
<span>The speaker is using the fallacy of building on an unproven assumption. The speaker has made the assumption that the Japanese make the best stereo sound systems in the world. This is merely his/her opinion, and is not a proven fact. Thus, when the speaker bases another argument on that assumption, he has used a fallacy in reasoning.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
When analyzing the key elements of a country's economic environment, it is best to apply a systems perspective?
Alenkasestr [34]
True. When you analyze the key elements of a country's economic perspective environment, it is best to apply a systems perspective. When you follow the systems perspective you should be taking all of the behaviors, attributes and actions of a system when it's in its environment. instead of individualizing people and things within, it's an overall evaluation of the system. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A large computer company was well known for the frequent debate among employees regarding various issues. Employees weren't afra
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Do you believe E-sports will continue to grow in the future? Why or why not?
    5·2 answers
  • Which term is used to describe software used by cybercriminals?
    11·1 answer
  • The going concern assumption implies that: 1. a firm will continue to be in business for the foreseeable future. 2. a firm will
    15·1 answer
  • For a performance appraisal to be effective, it should do all of the following except: a. take place several times a year b. be
    14·1 answer
  • On March 31, Dower Publishing discounted a $30,000 note at a local bank. The note was dated February 28 and required the payment
    9·1 answer
  • Interpreting the Accounts receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company (HPQ) reports the following in its 2007 10-K report.
    11·1 answer
  • Paul and Libby White (both are age 66) are married and together have AGI of $105,000 in 2018. They have two dependents and file
    9·1 answer
  • JDS Shipyard's projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and plan assets were $75 million, $65 million, and
    6·1 answer
  • Diamond Boot Factory normally sells their specialty boots for $26 a pair. An offer to buy 70 boots for $18 per pair was made by
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!