Answer:
society.
Explanation:
The evolutionary theory of Charles Darwin inspired many sociologist to suggest that society is itself an organism which evolves from a primitive stage to a modern one. L.H Morgan suggests three stages of evolution which are savagery, barbarism, and civilization by which society moves from simple to more complex form. British sociologist Herbert Spencer applied Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest to society and according to him western societies are better adaptive to the changing times and therefore they are surviving and evolving.
Answer: They suffered negative consequences because they lost both their land and their allies.
The French and Indian War was the part of the Seven Years' War that was fought in North America, mainly between the French and the English. Most of the Native American peoples aligned with France as they enjoyed a profitable trading partnership with French companies.
However, England won the war, with devastating consequences for the Native people. The English cut off their supplies and imposed new laws. They also removed the Native Americans from their lands. This led to extensive conflict between the two groups.
Answer: As a result of the Renaissance in Europe, information spread more easily and new knowledge and technology helped seafaring nations broaden trade, increase wealth and gain power.
Explanation:
Answer:
SEE BELOW
Explanation:
By testing their predictions with the observational methods of science, psychologists are most clearly relying on:
<u>An empirical approach</u>
Answer:
The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist philosophies are compared and contrasted below.
Explanation:
Federalists believed in a strong Federal government which they believed would keep the states under the control and reduce any conflicts. Anti-federalists on the other hand believed that the states should get more power and that the power of the Federal government needs to be limited. Federalists feared the mob rule and factions because America had more factions during the time of independence and it was always the fear of the federalists that only a strong federal government could control the impact of these factions. Anti-federalists on the other hand feared that a strong federalism would lead to dictatorship and power of few people. Federalists wanted to have a loose interpretation of the constitution which means the constitution is meant for change as and when the society and the government want it to be changed. Anti-federalists on the other hand were not in favor of changing the constitution because they felt it would lead to very weak country because anyone could change the base of the country. Thus, federalists and anti-federalists tried to influence the American population of that time but when it came to the Independence War, everyone came together because everyone believed in freedom and liberty which they believed would liberate them from the oppression of the British.
