<span>Which of the following risk percentage patterns would BEST support the influence of genetic factors inexplaining bipolar disorder—(1) in the general population, (2) among close relatives of people withbipolar disorder, and (3) among identical twins of people with bipolar disorder? 1 percent, 10 percent, 40 percent.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Among the options above, option A is exempt because terrorist attack is on dependent on the weather conditions, terrorist attack is aimed at people and the situations around people. weather conditions that are unstable is not a a yard stick in determining a potential terrorist attack.
Victims statements are watch statements that shouldn't be taken for granted, some define eminent attacks or potential treats of an attack
Location type should be consider re strictly because these are the places were people will be and be affected.
Type of call is very very important to take note of as they can give good details of the potential attack.
So therefore, option A is the best answer to exempt from the options above.
For the answer to the question above, George Wahington wants to send ambassadors to Europe. He sends <span>Thomas Pinckney to </span>Spain<span> to negotiate what would become known as Pinckney's Treaty.
I hope my answer gave you clarity to your choices.</span>
Integration can be improved through long-term agreements, cross-organizational integrated product teams, and improved communication between partners. This statement is True.
What is a long term agreement?
Long Term Agreements (LTAs) are framework of agreements which are maintained with one or more suppliers for a certain commodity, service, or group of them for a period of up to 3 years.
"LTAs are used to ensure a reliable source of supply for goods and services at the best-value price, in accordance with predefined terms and conditions."
To learn more about LTAs,
brainly.com/question/14036769
#SPJ4
<span>b. a federal district court to exercise original jurisdiction.
</span>
<span>The original jurisdiction of a court is the power to hear a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, when a higher court has the power to review a lower court's decision.</span>
