They could try to get a new lawyer and have them try to change the trails outcome and fight for it all over again
If you want me to explain it more let me know
Slaveholders could seize an alleged runaway in free territory and bring the accused before a federal judge or local magistrate to prove title to the slave and obtain a certificate of rendition entitling the master to remove the slave from the free jurisdiction. The law placed most of the burden of slave catching on masters, including the burden of dealing with uncooperative Northerners, and it made rendition hearings inconvenient to arrange because few federal judges were available to participate. The 1850 Fugitive Slave Act provided for federal circuit courts to designate commissioners specifically to hear rendition proceedings, and it authorized commissioners and federal marshals to form a posse of bystanders to capture runaways.
Answer:
yes , they have a right to have their own decisions but then agian they have to folllow laws as well but they have rights to make the right choice in their own life.
Explanation:
Umm, I don't think this is an academic question. If it is, then sorry because my answer would not be acceptable as I didn't attend the history class you are talking about. I am answering this in context of my history class
I enjoyed the progression of French Revolution, how the people knew what was good for them. People were really aware and active.
Answer:
The creation of governments in Nation.
Explanation:
The significance of the statement is the agitation against a Monarch system of leadership perceived of social subjugation. It was therefore a clamour for liberalism, freedom in layman's terms therefore establishing government with powers perceived to have emanated from the governed. The commoners in most settings.
