How often must an employer conduct a review or perform a training session of the emergency action plan?

Social Studies

1 answer:

photoshop1234 [79]2 years ago

8 0

At least yearly, an employer conducts a review or performs a training session on the emergency action plan.

When work activities or the physical workplace change or if new dangers are discovered, a well-maintained emergency plan should be examined and updated. At the very least once a year, emergency preparations should be tested. An emergency action plan must be in writing, kept on file, and made available to staff members for review. However, an employer with fewer than ten workers may tell them about the strategy orally. Minimum components of an emergency action plan. When an employee is first assigned, the employer must go over the aspects of the plan that the employee needs to be aware of to safeguard them in an emergency.

Learn more about Emergency Action Plan here:

brainly.com/question/26048098

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Mention four negative effects of irresponsible discussion of reasons for gender based violance to the victims.

vichka [17]

Answer:

Consequences include increased incidences of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder,

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What does it mean to have the ""more sure word of prophecy""?

Sever21 [200]

Answer:

When Peter says that it is more sure, he means “more sure even than seeing Jesus with one's own eyes in all the glory of His second coming,

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which best describes consensus historiography?

marissa [1.9K]

The correct answer for this question is "a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions." The statement that best describes consensus historiography is that it is <span>a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Hy are most production possibilities frontiers (ppfs) for goods bowed outward (concave downward)?

Vika [28.1K]

When there are not enough productive resources, the production possibility frontier (PPF) slopes downward, but when resources are distributed according to their comparative advantages, it bends outward. According to the law of rising opportunity cost, this allocation will likely result in an adverse outcome.

This is further explained below.

<h3>Hy is most production possibilities frontiers (PFS) for goods bowed outward (concave downward)?</h3>

Generally, The Productivity and Potential Frontier is sloping downward because there are not enough productive resources, but it is bowing outward because resource allocation is driven by comparative advantage.

The term "resource" refers to all of the resources that are present in our surroundings, are possible from a financial, cultural, and technical standpoint, and are available to us so that we may fulfill our requirements and gratify our desires.

In conclusion, The scarcity of productive resources is what causes the PPF to slope downward. It follows that the rule of growing opportunity cost will be valid if such an allocation is performed.