Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Answer:
the answer is They are seeking Economic <u>Value</u>.
Explanation:
In a marketing context, customers seek a fair return in goods and/or services for their hard-earned money and scarce time. They are seeking <u>value</u>, which reflects the relationship of benefits to costs, or what you get for what you give.
Value is variable, lets zero in on Economic Value since the subject is effective demand from a customer.
Economic Value is the worth or benefit derived from a product or service paid for. It could be comfort, pleasure, satisfaction, relief from pain, etc.
It is directly proportional to the amount paid for. Therefore, greater value attracts higher cost and vice versa.
Answer:
not only Japan but also other country but most of the comic book are from japan
Answer: No, Paul has not breached a contract.
Explanation: To answer this, we must first we must define what a contract is.
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally binding, and which guides or governs the actions or conducts of the parties involved.
A quality that makes a contract legally binding is that it is enforceable by law.
In the scenario given in the question above, Paul has not breached any contract because there isn't one. The promise to buy dinner has not been legally bound, therefore, it is not enforceable by law, in essence, it is not qualified to be called a contract.
<span>For 2 nights cost is $10,000 for theater rental, insurance, and musicians. 10% of $10,000 is $1000 that goes to theater if $10,000 worth of ticket is sold, which is to break even. Now the break even cost is $10,000+$1000= $11,000. Cost of one ticket is $10, to break even the total cost, number of tickets that must sell is $11,000 divided by $10, which is 1100 tickets. 1100 tickets must sell in total for two nights to break even.</span>
