Answer:
-1.5, -1
Step-by-step explanation:
midpoint formula
(x1 + x2 / 2) , (y1 + y2/ 2)
-6 + 3 / 2 , -8 + 6 / 2
Percent Change = New Value − Old Value|Old Value| × 100%
Example: There were 200 customers yesterday, and 240 today:
240 − 200|200|× 100% = 40200 × 100% = 20%
A 20% increase.
Percent Error = |Approximate Value − Exact Value||Exact Value| × 100%
Example: I thought 70 people would turn up to the concert, but in fact 80 did!
|70 − 80||80| × 100% = 1080 × 100% = 12.5%
I was in error by 12.5%
(Without using the absolute value, the error is −12.5%, meaning I under-estimated the value)
The difference between the two is that one states factual calculations and the other is a theoretical guess
The answer is -148≤ F≤ -103!
Answer:
Hello! After reading your question I have deduced that the correct answer is 288² cm.
Step-by-step explanation:
The way I came to this conclusion was as follows:
Firstly:
If said rectangle is two squares put side by side (adjacent), then a valid assumption is that both squares are the same size.
This is because all four sides of a square have to be equal.
Thus if the two squares are joined together on one side, then all the other sides of both the squares will be the same length.
Thus both of the squares are going to be the same size, so they will have the same area.
Secondly:
If the area of one square is 144² cm then the area of the other square should also be 144² cm.
Thus if you combine the areas of both the squares, that make up the rectangle, you are left with the area of the rectangle being 288² cm.
I hope this helped!
The right answer is Option A.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let,
x be the postcards
y be the large envelops
According to given statement;
14x+5y=12 Eqn 1
10x+15y=24.80 Eqn 2
Multiplying Eqn 1 by 3;

Subtracting Eqn 2 from Eqn 3;

Dividing both sides by 32

Putting x=0.35 in Eqn 1;

Dividing both sides by 5

Therefore, one large envelope costs $1.42
The right answer is Option A.
Keywords: linear equations, subtraction
Learn more about linear equations at:
#LearnwithBrainly