Answer:
-Noah could buy 10 tacos for $15.
-Jada's tacos were not the same price as Noah's tacos.
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use a rule of three to find the amount of tacos that Noah could buy with $15:
$6 → 4
$15 → x
x=(15*4)/6=10
At this rate, Noah could buy 10 tacos for $15.
Now, to find out if Jada's tacos were the same price as Noah's tacos, you have to find the price per taco in each case by dividing the amount paid by the number of tacos bought:
Noah: 15/10=1.5
Jada: 72/50=1.44
According to this, Jada's tacos were not the same price as Noah's tacos.
Answer:
4:18 6:27 plenty more but you said to so
The width used for the car spaces are taken as a multiples of the width of
the compact car spaces.
Correct response:
- The store owners are incorrect
<h3 /><h3>Methods used to obtain the above response</h3>
Let <em>x</em><em> </em>represent the width of the cars parked compact, and let a·x represent the width of cars parked in full size spaces.
We have;
Initial space occupied = 10·x + 12·(a·x) = x·(10 + 12·a)
New space design = 16·x + 9×(a·x) = x·(16 + 9·a)
When the dimensions of the initial and new arrangement are equal, we have;
10 + 12·a = 16 + 9·a
12·a - 9·a = 16 - 10 = 6
3·a = 6
a = 6 ÷ 3 = 2
a = 2
Whereby the factor <em>a</em> < 2, such that the width of the full size space is less than twice the width of the compact spaces, by testing, we have;
10 + 12·a < 16 + 9·a
Which gives;
x·(10 + 12·a) < x·(16 + 9·a)
Therefore;
The initial total car park space is less than the space required for 16
compact spaces and 9 full size spaces, therefore; the store owners are
incorrect.
Learn more about writing expressions here:
brainly.com/question/551090
Answer:
Transitive property is used in step 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
Transitive property states that if
Here we have
Answer:
i cant see the picture its blocked
Step-by-step explanation:
