Answer:
<h3>Reflect, explain, reason, understand, negotiate.</h3>
Explanation:
The five steps strategy for exchanging differences called RERUN was propounded by Pulido-Tobiassen and Gonzalez-Mena. It was primarily a method for children's mental health therapists to easily work and negotiate with children from diverse culture and other social differences.
It aims at establishing effective communication between two parties by following its five steps strategy. They are:
1. Reflect: The first step is to listen and understand what the other person is thinking or saying. It is the process of listening carefully.
2. Explain: This step emphasizes on explaining your thoughts and feeling towards the other person's thoughts and words.
3. Reason: This step emphasizes on reasoning your thoughts and words by not over-ruling the other person's opinion and words.
4. Understand: In this step, both the parties try to understand the differences in their viewpoints.
5. Negotiate: Lastly after understanding each other's issues and viewpoints, both parties should come into terms through negotiation and resolve.
I believe the answer is: Developmental leadership
Developmental leadership refers to a form of leadership that is aimed to create a sustainable growth within the organization and the personal development among the members. This type of leader tend to pay a lot of attention to their employees well being and company culture.
Answer:It is not related to the area of corporate social responsibility
Explanation:
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a business model under which the Businesses are required to be involved socially which create stable relationships amongst the company, employees, stakeholders and the public.
Ethics refers to certain conducts which are considered right or wrong based on a particular group of people. These are determined by the society which is also different from morals which are individually determined.
These conducts we tend to follow them because they are prescribed by society at large eventhoug someone may not truly believe in them.
The Supreme Court ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case has affected by stopping Congress from abolishing the Slave system. Also, the ruling made a lot of consequences economically and politically.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Dred Scott was a black man and also a slave who fought for his freedom for a decade. His freedom was denied by several courts than he finally succeeded in the Supreme Court by achieving his freedom. Dred and his Wife Harriet been enslaved by Dr.John Emerson.
Once he died Dred and Harriet automatically owned by Irene who's Emerson's wife. Though Irene decided to live with her father she hired out Dred and Harriet instead of letting them free. This made Dred filed case in 1846 against the Stanford(Irene's Family) Irene transferred them to her family by retaining her ownership.
He won the case yet ruling stated that he's still a slave. That means negro people may be in the US from its starting yet they are not Americans. Thus the Constitutional amendments are not applicable for them. Later he sold to his first owner and he got his freedom in 1857 and he died after 18 months.
