Answer:
opposing to another ones beliefs or idea creates an hostile environment in a society of people
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, if the person themselves are paying for it, it also depends on how picky you're being and who your complaining to.
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
It could be B, C, or D. Sorry for the uncertainty.
A sociologist would likely call this phenomenon as
environmental racism. The environmental racism involves of having to point out
injustice with mixed racial context in the environment. It could be seen from
Josh’s actions and behavior as he views the environment differently and that he
wants to move but he couldn't and he probably thinks that he is living in a
place like that solely because he is from a poor part of the town.