This problem is solved by using the compound interest formula:
A=P(1+(I/period))^(number of periods)
Where A = amount accumulated and P = amount loaned and I = Interest
A = ? P = $2, 000, I = 0.115, Period = 2 (semi annually) Number of period = 2
*7 (I. e paid twice over a 7 yrs span)
So we have
A = 2000 ( 1 + 0.115/2)^(14)
A = 2000 ( 1 + 0.0575)^(14)
A = 2000 (1.0575)^(14)
A = 2000 (2.1873851765154) = 4374.77035
So we have 4374.80 to the nearest cent.
The ethics trap that is faced here would be contemplating to accept the reallocation because rejecting it may mean trouble and even lead to a lose of our jobs.
<h3>What is meant by ethical trap?</h3>
This is the term that has to do with the circumstances that may lead an individual to do away with the core values and the principles that they have. The trap here is that I may lose my job or may not have any bonus but accepting is going against the ethics and the values that I may hold special.
What should have been in this situation would have been to come clean in the first place so as to avoid going against ethics and the principles of the profession. The best way to do this would be to go to the head of division and explain the situation at hand to him.
Hence we can say that The ethics trap that is faced here would be contemplating to accept the reallocation because rejecting it may mean trouble and even lead to a lose of our jobs.
Read more on ethics here:
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
Answer:
according to my opinion you should make a decision tree
Answer:
staffing decision making problems
Explanation:
In simple words, corporate finance relates to the branch of finance that studies how and when an organisation and individuals should incest their money in the market.
In this subject matter. the analyst takes into consideration various market factors such as interest rates, GDP etc. and by applying various tools and methods make a decision.
It particularly deals with investment decisions and asset management problems and not staffing decisions.
